
Indonesia
Category
3 of 7
| Risk type | Short | Long |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereign | ||
| Public | ||
| Bank | ||
| Corporate |
The icons indicate EKN's risk assessment.
A lower country risk category means a lower country risk. The icons mark EKN's ability to cover risks to different buyers in the country.
-
No policy established
- EKN has not analysed this country recently and therefore has no current opinion. If an exporter submits an application for such a country, EKN performs an analysis of the country at short notice and determines a policy.
-
Normal risk assessment
- EKN decides on guarantee issue based on an assessment of risk in the transaction. There are no predefined restrictions in the risk assessment or assumptions for risk assessment.
-
Restrictive risk assessment
- EKN sets stricter requirements in the risk assessment in order to guarantee a transaction. EKN may have specified special criteria that are key to the risk assessment of the guarantee holder category in question. This may mean that EKN sets a requirement that the counter party must have its own hard currency earnings or that external support can be expected, or that EKN sets a requirement for a letter of credit, government or bank guarantee. If the formulation of the transaction deviates from a defined restriction, we normally set more stringent conditions and may in the worst case refuse to guarantee the transaction. More stringent conditions may be that we reduce the sum guaranteed, raise the premium or require some form of security.
-
Normally off cover
- Here EKN does not normally cover currency transfer risks. However in some circumstances EKN may be able to go further with high risk countries than the restrictions of the country policy indicate. The application is then tested under the so-called GSL facility, which refers to guarantee issue with special country evaluation. There are specific requirements for this, primarily that the exporter has experience of the market in question. The risk is then shared with the exporter and by means of a mark-up on the premium.
-
OECD or EU countries
- Because of EU rules, EKN cannot issue guarantees for transactions with a risk period of less than two years for exports to Australia, EU countries, Iceland, Japan, Canada, Norway, New Zealand, Switzerland or the USA. If you have any questions, please telephone us on +46 8-788 00 00.
Country risk analysis
Country Risk Analysis of Indonesia
The latest Country Risk Analysis of Indonesia was issued in July 2026.
Commodity-based economy
Indonesia is the world’s fourth most populous country, with 284 million inhabitants. Since the fall of the Suharto regime in 1998, the country has made significant democratic progress. State institutions have been strengthened, and peaceful transfers of power through elections take place regularly.
Alongside this development, the economy has performed strongly, with stable growth averaging five per cent per year between 2000 and 2025. Poverty has declined, and a growing middle class has strengthened domestic demand. Since 2023, Indonesia has been classified as an upper-middle-income country by the World Bank.
The economy benefits from substantial natural resources, including coal, natural gas, metals, palm oil, and rubber. Commodity-based exports account for just over half of total exports and represent a key source of foreign exchange earnings. At the same time, a large domestic market—where private consumption accounts for around half of GDP—helps cushion external shocks.
The agricultural sector is productive, with output including rice, coffee, and soybeans. It employs just under 30 per cent of the workforce, although its contribution to GDP is relatively limited at around 12 per cent. Overall, natural resources, a large domestic market, and a productive agricultural sector contribute to a relatively diversified economy.
At the same time, reliance on natural resources entails vulnerabilities. Dependence on commodity exports makes the economy sensitive to fluctuations in global commodity prices and demand. Over the longer term, reliance on fossil fuels creates transition risks as global climate policy tightens. At the same time, Indonesia is well positioned in other parts of the green transition. The country has substantial reserves of strategic minerals, including one of the world’s largest nickel reserves—a metal used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries after processing.
If Indonesia manages regulatory and environmental challenges, there is potential to establish the country as an industrial hub within EV value chains, which would support long-term growth and reduce exposure to commodity price cycles.
Resilience under pressure
The war in the Middle East in spring 2026 is testing the resilience of the economy. Rising prices for oil, fertilisers, and other inputs are pushing up inflation, reducing household purchasing power, and dampening economic activity. To ease the burden on households, the government has maintained fuel subsidies, putting pressure on public finances and increasing the risk of higher public debt. In addition, disruptions to global supply chains have led to longer delivery times for inputs, while rising interest rates have worsened financing conditions. Weaker global demand has also dampened export prospects.
The local currency (rupiah) has depreciated since the onset of the conflict. This depreciation coincides with widening budget deficits and weakened investor confidence. To stabilise the exchange rate, the central bank has raised the policy rate and intervened in financial markets, although the effects have been limited.
Indonesia’s diversified energy mix and its role as a net exporter of energy have partly mitigated the impact of the crisis. Domestic coal production dominates energy supply, reducing exposure to rising oil prices. Strong exports of coal and natural gas can also partly offset the deterioration in the current account caused by higher oil prices, thereby reducing vulnerability in the external position.
Foreign exchange reserves have declined but still cover approximately five months of imports, contributing to resilience and providing buffers against continued global uncertainty.
Overall, growth is expected to remain stable at just over five per cent in 2026 and 2027, while inflation is projected to increase slightly to just under three per cent.
Weaker public finances after power shift
The 2024 presidential election was won by Prabowo Subianto. During the campaign, extensive reform proposals were presented, including subsidised school meals, housing initiatives, and ambitious growth targets. Since taking office, public finances have weakened as these reforms have been implemented. A key challenge is low tax revenue in a regional context, which limits fiscal space.
Reforms to increase tax revenues have been initiated, but their effects are expected only in the medium term. The budget deficit has therefore increased and is approaching the statutory ceiling of three per cent of GDP. To sustain the pace of reform, the government has signalled that raising this ceiling may be considered. As a result, confidence in the fiscal framework—which has long served as an important anchor for the economy—risks weakening. Against this backdrop, Moody’s and Fitch revised their outlooks from stable to negative in spring 2026.
Over the longer term, Indonesia’s exposure to physical climate risks represents a growing burden on public finances. The country has historically been affected by a large number of natural disasters, with flooding being the most frequent. As sea temperatures rise, both the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events are expected to increase, potentially exacerbating storms, floods, and landslides.
Given the country’s high population density, the economic and social consequences could be significant. In the ND-GAIN Index (2024), which measures countries’ vulnerability to climate change and their ability to mitigate risks, Indonesia ranks 85th out of 187 countries.
Business environment
In the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), Indonesia’s scores for economic institutions have improved across several dimensions and are now slightly above the average for emerging and developing economies in Asia. However, the business environment remains challenging and is characterised by extensive bureaucracy, including overlapping regulations, laws, and institutional mandates. Regulations change frequently, and implementation varies across authorities.
Swedish companies exporting to or investing in Indonesia often face high import tariffs, local content requirements, and other trade barriers that hinder market access. The free trade agreement between the EU and Indonesia, expected to be implemented in 2027, has the potential to reduce these barriers and improve conditions for foreign companies, including Swedish firms.
Corruption remains a challenge, reflected in a deterioration in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index, where Indonesia ranked 109th out of 180 countries in 2025 (down from 85th in 2019). This shift coincided with the pandemic, when large volumes of public support were distributed, as well as with legislative changes in 2019 that critics argue weakened the anti-corruption agency (KPK) and increased the risk of political interference. Increased digitalisation may over time reduce opportunities for corruption, for example in relation to permits, licensing, and customs procedures.
In its business assessments, EKN considers the risk of adverse impacts on human rights. The focus is on potential impacts arising from the operations in which exported goods are used. Key issues include working conditions, child and forced labour, excessive use of force by security forces, indigenous rights, and land rights.
According to Maplecroft’s human rights index, Indonesia scores below the average for both OECD high-income countries and upper-middle-income countries. Indigenous rights stand out as one of the areas with the highest risk levels, both in absolute terms and compared with OECD high-income and lower-middle-income countries. This may relate, for example, to land rights, access to natural resources, and the right to self-determination.
For companies, this may result in risks of direct or indirect involvement in violations of Indigenous rights or association with violations committed by third parties.
Risks related to land rights are also significantly higher than in OECD high-income countries. This also applies to risks associated with human rights violations by both public and private security forces, which may be particularly challenging for companies relying on such forces for their own security.
EKN’s policy
EKN classifies Indonesia in country risk class 3 (on a scale from 0 to 7). Standard risk assessment applies to all categories of counterparties, meaning there are no predefined restrictions on the issuance of guarantees. Transactions are assessed on their own merits without specific requirements or conditions.
EKN’s commitment and experience
EKN’s exposure amounts to SEK 393 million. Between 2020 and 2025, EKN issued guarantees for 51 transactions involving 15 exporters, totalling just over SEK 5 billion. The main sectors are transport and construction equipment, as well as telecommunications.
EKN’s payment experience is relatively good, with few claims. However, payment delays occur. For guarantees issued between 2020 and 2025, delays have been observed in approximately 10 per cent of cases. The median duration of delays is 140 days, likely influenced by the pandemic. Relatively few transactions result in claims. Over the past five years, EKN has paid claims on four transactions, amounting to just over SEK 17 million. Recovery rates vary but have generally been low.
More for companies that want to export to Indonesia
EKN's guarantees
EKN's guarantees reduce the risk of payment defaults and help banks support businesses. Which guarantee suits your needs?
EKN's guarantees
Guarantee guide
Are you unsure which guarantee is the best fit for your specific transaction? Try our guarantee guide.
Guarantee guideRead more about Indonesia
- Risk
- Trends
- Tech
Can global trade withstand the new era of uncertainty?
Can global trade remain resilient in 2026? Experts assess geopolitical risk, AI, export trends and emerging growth markets.
Can global trade withstand the new era of uncertainty?
- Markets
- Trends
- Trade
Swedish exports to East Asia set to recover
As the countries of East and Southeast Asia are successful in reducing the spread of Covid-19, Swedish exports bounce back, notes EKN Chief Analyst Stefan Karlsson in a fresh report.
Swedish exports to East Asia set to recover